Archive for the ‘entertainment’ Category

Monday, July 26th, 2010

In 1984 Leonard Cohen, notorious singer-songwriter and all-around talented guy, wrote a now famous song called Hallelujah. While difficult to get released in the beginning (see CBC interview) this song went on to eclipse, if you’ll forgive the artistic license, every song except Happy Birthday and How Great Thou Art in interpretations and performances. I fell in love with this song a few years ago when I heard Jeff Buckley’s version, as recommended by a good friend. I had no idea of the rich and illustrious background of Hallelujah; but I did know that it would be one of my favorite songs for the rest of my life.

(more…)

Thursday, July 8th, 2010

I highly recommend reading the following bit of spam I received from “bbenjiluin@hotmail.com” (Note how it doesn’t match the email in the email). The best quote is “I want  to initiate dating with you”.

Hi!
I received a letter from dating site. And they informed me about your email.  They also tagged that you are looking for a partner. I was fond of your character so I want  to initiate dating with you and learn you more bettterr. We could send photos each other. How do you consider this?
My email is h_zdenek@yahoo.com .
and I will respond you gladly and I will send some photos too.
My name is Helen and i am from Turkey.
The alternate title for this blog post is “Boris wants to initiate Natasha dating with you”. Please note that untrusted sources for emails are almost all bogus. Don’t give any information out.
Sunday, December 27th, 2009

b5_amazon_setAs usual, my first stop is always Amazon. They seem to have pretty solid, just-under-retail pricing scheme. They’ve been my number one online source for online purchases for the last five years. In this case, the price seemed incredibly high: $211!! That’s just over $40 dollars per season, which was more than what I would expect any  individual season to cost. I’m not buying diamonds, people.

b5_amazon

To verify this I added all of the individual seasons together, again priced at Amazon.   The result? $202.  This was disheartening. You could basically get a 5% discount by buying each item individually, but it’s not impressive enough to be anything more than  a blip. Something is wrong at Amazon, and I don’t like it. While I love Babylon 5, there’s got to be a better way.

At this point I checked eBay and put in a few bids. Most sets seemed to be going for anywhere between $90 and $140. This is 50% cheaper than the Amazon prices, but you’ve got to take your chances with the unknown sellers of the massive, online-sales supergiant.  I was further restricted from this option by my terrible bidding skills;  I kept losing every bid.

b5_buy_set

Returning to the world I love of higher prices with no bidding skill required, I decided to check Buy.com to see what they had in store for me.  I’ve been using this site on and off when Amazon’s prices border on the insane. The full series of Babylon 5 is available for $153 with shipping!!! How can this be? This price is 25% lower than the Amazon options.  At $30 per season we’re almost in business. It’s still quite the investment, but we’re talking about one of the best sci-fi shows of all time.

b5_buy

The last test was to see if the blip in Amazon’s pricing also applied to here.  Individual pricing of the seasons was $20 per season resulting in a flat $100 for all 5 seasons of B5. This cost is less than 50% of the Amazon prices, and 30% less than Buy.com complete set. The best news is how comparable the Buy.com price is to eBay listings without any of the hassle or dangers of bidding sales. If you haven’t noticed, I hate bidding on things. It makes me feel so…..dirty.

BONUS:

The Amazon Video Store is asking $2 per episode with discounts bringing the 20-something-episode seasons down to between $36 and $38. This puts their Video on Demand price for the full series at about $185. I’m a big fan of streaming video (Hulu, Netflix, and the Roku), but this price seems outrageous to me.  The distribution costs of the electronic versions are drastically lower than physical discs. While there will be continuing maintenance/bandwidth costs for electronic distribution, it’s completely absurd to think that this market will be successful without drastically reduced prices. I think Amazon is basing their VoD pricing on iTunes’ Store and Amazon’s own cloud services. It doesn’t make any sense to the end consumer right now to be spending this much on intangible product. Even if they see profit margin reduction in these early days it seems like they couldn’t afford the long term cost of losing any potential consumer base to Netflix, Blockbuster, and other video services.

Thursday, September 11th, 2008
2GB Creative Zen

It’s been a while since I’ve had a portable MP3 player….too long. Rather than bearing with the burden for years and years before I die due to lack of soothing tunes, I decided to satisfy that need. The object of my aural delight is a 2GB Creative Zen.

To all of you technophiles out there, “no, it’s not a Zune or an iPod”. I can’t justify spending over $100 bucks on a device, especially if it has software dependencies. I respect the options out there, particularly the proper potential of Wi-Fi synchronization in the Zune. If I were going to switch to a main player, it would probably be the Zune. That is, of course, if I didn’t get an option to pick up an iPhone first.  There’s no contest there.

But anyways, here’s a quick rundown…nothing to earth shattering.

What do I like:

  • Physical Size (near credit-card HxW and just large enough for 3/8in plug deep)
  • Expandable Storage using Secure Digital Cards
  • Drivers compatible with all Windows installs so far (no pc software needed)
  • Great WAV Recording Filtering for Clarity and Good Stream Rates
  • Loads of standard video support (Even my weirdly formatted videos look great)
  • Nice 2.5″ Display
  • FM Radio Displat
  • Simple Menu Interfaces
  • Photo Support (fantastic images)
  • Price ($80 new)

What don’t I like:

  • No “Play by Folder” Options (I’m an addict)
  • No support for Ogg Vorbis formats
  • No Soft key buttons (Starting/Stopping recordings is a pain)
  • Apparently they don’t use iCal format for calendar
  • Integrated Battery (It may be a must for size, but I don’t have to like it)
  • Poor earbuds included

But it’s a great product over all. I’ve been more inclined to record meetings now that I have it on my body so I can review discussions after the fact. And the WAV sampling is great, so fair quality speech at the 10 foot range is coming out at about 15 minutes per 2.5 megs. Not to mention everyone who has seen it has asked what it is; it’s very sleek.

If you’re looking for something fairly inexpensive but still sexy I’d advise you to check out the Creative Zen.

Important Note: I have a hard time talking about portable players without saying this but all the MP3′s on my Zen are legal.  I know just about everyone might have carryover stuff that may be of questionable legal background from your childhood (when you had no money and didn’t know any better), but it’s no excuse to keep taking money from people who earn it. 99 cents a song isn’t bad. And if you play 100+ hours of that video game, isn’t it worth $40-50?

I also like to take issue with the anachronism that is the modern day music conglomorate and DRM licensing. If I can purchase a player that can just let me use my music the way I need to use it. When I buy it, I should be able to put it on any device that I need without paying more royalties. I’m not advocating sharing and reselling, but the rights of use are there when it comes to entertainment.

Consumers Unite! Please buy your music, software, and movies and buy players that let you use them the way you want. It’s irresponsible to steal from artists and developers, but it’s not time to give money to these companies by locking into a software use nightmare or DRM fiascos.  Buy and use freely, respect and enjoy.

Saturday, July 12th, 2008

Went out with friends tonight to see Wall-e (it’s faster to spell this way, please just roll with it :) . By and large, HA, I found this movie to be delightful. Actually, adorable is probably the better term. The two girls 3 girls in our party were constantly “aww-ing” and I did my best to keep mine hidden behind my popcorn container. This was not an easy task, however, as I’m quite a sucker for heart-twanging romance and adorable characters.

One nice feature was the opening cartoon about a magician and his rabbit(I don’t speak Romanian, I assume it says ‘this is a legal showing of this feature, all proceeds go to Pixar’). The rabbit, a good challenger for the adorable characters in the main feature, was probably the most enjoyably cute animal creature I’ve seen since Yakky Doodle. His quest for gestational satisfaction leads him and his magician friend into a particularly clever battle that is both visually and creatively appealing. My only qualm was one or more groin injury jokes, something I’ve always considered in poor taste, but it was quickly over and the good far outweighed the bad. Very clever, and my congratulations are bestowed on the design team.

As for the main feature: very fun. It’s a wonderful romance story between two people who happen to be robots and happen to change the path of humanity. While the beginning was almost entirely given away by the trailer, it develops into a simple but enjoyable plot that would engage most movie-goers. The voice acting was great, proving once again that less really can be more, and I think we all agreed that the emotional connection that you get with the characters is the product of some amazing work at Pixar. I can’t remember the last time I felt so connected to a robot (no…that can’t be right).

The environmental message was obviously strong as the story moved on. While it became a little obvious at times I think it was very appropriate for younger kids without becoming too overpowering. When I came back I started reading some of the reviews with a particular interest in the ‘Christian family’ perspective. While I liked the positive sentiments (especially the fact that there were NO un-family-friendly moments AT ALL), I found that most complaints about this movie drift toward some kind of secret or lobbyist-driven environmental smackdown. But it appears that most, if not all, of these reviews come from clearly pre-viewing biased individuals.

I think this message of environmental responsibility was awe-inspiring for kids, who need to get motivated, and probably nothing more than a peanut m’n'm in the brain candy department for adults. I’m glad it’s out there and presented positively and I hope it does encourage someone to reduce waste, but I won’t hold my breath if that’s okay with you.  (Also, it’s cool to be green right now….however it’s not a mark of the secret ruling class. Please bring yourself back into reality and accept that ‘the man’ isn’t trying to control your brain to make you recycle against your will.)

Another point I have to make is about the morbidly obese population of people who all look the same: implausible but a reasonable caricature. It’s obvious that this was a shock portrayal and that by making a population full of fat people, you’d be setting yourself up for great jokes (like banana bombs from the top of a high tower in Worms). It is still unimpressive, just as in Idiocracy, how the portrayal of future generations falls flat in realism just to make a single, over-simplified point. Call me hard to please (‘You’re hard to please!’), but I think that there could have been a little more depth to that plot-point to make it tastier for the thinking-man. I mean, the kids weren’t paying attention to that plot anyways, right?

I mean, do you seriously think that these people wouldn’t ever get bored sitting at their computer screens? At what point does Che Guevera (I know it’s a ridiculous point) grow up to be complacent in a hover chair? Does accidentally breaking the TRANSLUCENT video screens really cause a eureka moment in a fat person’s life. I don’t think so. Everything is cooler on television, if anything they’ll start complaining about how there aren’t enough cool explosions in real life.

Possibly the most interesting message, and one I believe was missed by some, was the significance of the corporation’s actions in the film. It’s another dark-side tarring view of corporate control, but it’s interesting to see what lengths they’ve gone to in the story line. While it, again, mirrors the advertisement-crazed, thought-blinding control of Brawndo, this movie actually shows the corporate head of BnL in a ‘presidential’ role. While it doesn’t really focus in too closely, it’s clearly a parody to some degree. This makes a significant note about the encroachment of corporate entities in areas of public sector power. Is it earth-shatterning? No, it’s Disney…just be cool, okay?

The main proof I have of it being Disney: the happy ending. So here’s my thinking, and I was alone in this, wouldn’t it have been better if he never remembered? What if she found the boot again and kept it with her as a reminder of how he cared enough about her to sacrifice everything. Yeah, heartwrenching, I know. But imagine the power of that moment. As I discussed (basically was taught) with an old friend, most other countries hate the happy endings that we American’s need in every story. Feel good, yes, but at the cost of realism and power? I know. It’s unrealistic to ask for, but I gues I’ll take the cute happy ending with me for now as I know it’ll still give me those warm fuzzies as i go to bed tonight.

Aside from that, the major plausibility flaws include: size issues between the initial spaceship landing and the larger spaceship, plant flourishing inside an closed refridgerator, artificial intelligence available through a malfunction or sheer will (see the end), gravity control on spaceship, buttons are predominant way of computers communicating in the future despite obvious inefficiency,  return of species on the planet like birds at the end. Other things are suspect, such as the force of a fire extinguisher (even in the future) being able to so drastically being able to create such a significant effect on a creature of Wall-e’s mass,  failure of Wall-e to melt on takeoff while on the outside of the spaceship, communication in space, and the ability of morbidly obese people to procreate easily. This is just more proof that I am a fun-hater, right?

Despite what appears, now, to be a callous review, I did really enjoy this. It’s probably the first of many movies that I’ve seen in theatres that I wouldn’t mind owning some day. Go see it, you’ll enjoy it. And leave a comment, fool. I want to hear how far off I was. I’m not saying I won’t ignore you, I’m just saying I wouldn’t mind hearing it. :D