<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Peaceful Programmer &#187; photography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.raymondberg.com/archives/category/photography/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.raymondberg.com</link>
	<description>A Blog that Walks the Fine Line Between Usefulness and Acrobats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:19:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Sunset Over Virginia</title>
		<link>http://blog.raymondberg.com/archives/114</link>
		<comments>http://blog.raymondberg.com/archives/114#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 02:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rwb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virginia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rwberg.org/?p=114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got a few photos of a rather beautiful &#8220;sunset afterglow&#8221;. The sunset was more beautiful than the images, however. I don&#8217;t know whose fault that is. Shutter: 4 Seconds, Aperture: F/5.7, ISO: 64 Shutter: 4 Seconds, Aperture: F/6.8 ISO: 64]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got a few photos of a rather beautiful &#8220;sunset afterglow&#8221;. The sunset was more beautiful than the images, however. I don&#8217;t know whose fault that is.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.raymondberg.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/dscf6483-medium.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-115" title="Sunset on Leesburg" src="http://blog.raymondberg.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/dscf6483-medium-300x225.jpg" alt="Sunset on Leesburg" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Shutter: 4 Seconds, Aperture: F/5.7, ISO: 64</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.raymondberg.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/dscf6494-medium.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-116" title="Sunset Over Leesburg" src="http://blog.raymondberg.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/dscf6494-medium-300x225.jpg" alt="Sunset Over Leesburg" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Shutter: 4 Seconds, Aperture: F/6.8 ISO: 64</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.raymondberg.com/archives/114/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Photography and the Simple Man</title>
		<link>http://blog.raymondberg.com/archives/75</link>
		<comments>http://blog.raymondberg.com/archives/75#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rwb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rwberg.org/?p=75</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A while back I found there was a rather gaping void of creativity in my life and I needed to fill it with some sort of right brain activity. I had been doing things like some elementary web design and page layout stuff, but it was more about numbers than nuances when you program CSS [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A while back I found there was a rather gaping void of creativity in my life and I needed to fill it with some sort of right brain activity. I had been doing things like some elementary web design and page layout stuff, but it was more about numbers than nuances when you program <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cascading_Style_Sheets" target="_blank">CSS </a>stuff. So I decided I&#8217;d take up photography.</p>
<p>The main driver for this was that I was no longer &#8220;supporting&#8221; a second person in my life. So at this point I could actually afford to perform a little &#8220;me spending&#8221;.  Nothing extravagant, just something to get me started and wouldn&#8217;t make me feel like a <a href="http://www.shooter.net/index.php/Item/turn-off-yer-damn-flash/" target="_blank">photography neophyte</a> every time I took pictures in public. The <a href="http://www.dcresource.com/reviews/fuji/finepix_s700-review/" target="_blank">Fujifilm S700</a> seemed pretty perfect for that. It was also right in my price range as a college student ( $$ &lt; 200 ).</p>
<p>The camera actually wound up being fairly impressive, but a little outside my abilities at first. The round knob on the top was daunting enough with it&#8217;s 11 shooting modes. That number turned out to be 8 with the manual shooting modes out.  You can also forget about any configuration menus as those would be too far.</p>
<p>After a month or so of &#8220;point and shoot&#8221; stuff, I began eying up that manual mode.  I still didn&#8217;t have the knowledge, but I decided it was time to read up. I then found that there were 3 basic controls that would allow for varied shots, and I could mess with them from there.  Here&#8217;s a quick summary.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Shutter Speed</strong> &#8211; The amount of time the lens is exposed to the light. These are commonly notated as an amount of seconds ( e.g 1/120 sec[ave], 1/1000 sec[short], 4 sec[very long] ). Too little and the light will be too dim, to much and the motion will be blurred.</p>
<p><strong>Aperture </strong>- The size of the window that exposes the world to your lens.  These are represented as F-stops (e.g F-3.5[large], F-13[small]).  If the size is too small, the picture will be too dark but if the size is too big then your field of focus is very small.</p>
<p><strong>ISO </strong>- The sensitivity of the camera&#8217;s sensor to light.  These are usually factors of 100 (some exceptions) between 100 and the thousands (ISO 100 [normal], ISO 1600 [very sensitive]). Again, too little and you&#8217;ll not see anything, but too much means the image will be grainy.</p></blockquote>
<p>As I said, these were unfamiliar to me so I experimented a bit. Since I normally shoot scenary I took a lesson from <a href="http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/11-surefire-tips-for-improving-your-landscape-photography/" target="_blank">a quick tips guide for landscape shots</a>. I started to shoot manually and shrink my aperture for distances. Sure enough, I could now pick up distant details that I was missing with my previous shots. I was also able to</p>
<p>My biggest issue now is the fact that my camera is designed to be a point and shoot camera. When I&#8217;m out shooting it takes time to switch between all three settings. ISO is the worst as it&#8217;s in a menu and requires about 4 button clicks to alter it and get back to the action. Adding in the fact that manual focus dissallows alteration of settings while you&#8217;re shooting you can see why I&#8217;m considering getting an SLR soon.</p>
<p>I do really enjoy my camera and I&#8217;ve taken about 6000 shots this year with it. The hardest part for me is getting through the editing and removal of these shots.  After any 20o+ photo shoot I find that it takes me about an hour to an hour and a half in Picasa3 to find redundancies, delete bad shots, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geotagging" target="_blank">GeoTag</a>, and do some light (as in amount) editing. That&#8217;s not bad, but getting around to those 1000+ photos from my trip to Colorado is looking particularly daunting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.raymondberg.com/archives/75/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
